Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than FX-8150 - 264 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-8150 - $59.99 vs $64.03
- Up to 21% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-8150 - $0.23 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |