Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 2165 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - 175 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $68.02 vs $122.03
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i7-3770 - $0.39 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
173
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |