Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8150 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8150 is 377 days older than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6300 - $64.03 vs $74.04
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - $0.28 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6160 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |