Buy on Amazon
$82.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3443 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8150 - 466 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-8150 - $75.34 vs $82.02
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 FX8150 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8150FRW8KGU FD8150FRGUBOX 8MB
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74055 minutes ago
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for $75.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74055 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
