Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $64.03 vs $85.13
- Up to 19% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10105F - $0.34 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than FX-8150 - 202 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15330 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
80%
Price, $
$85.13
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |