Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $64.03 vs $78.02
- Up to 15% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7400T - $0.5 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8150 - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |