Buy on Amazon
$79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 238 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-6350 - $79.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-6350 - $0.51 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 6 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2394 minutes ago
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
