Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1858 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $91.98 vs $135.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100 - $0.54 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220 - 184 vs 169 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
169
91.84782608695652%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4917 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
73.97260273972603%
Price, $
$135
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
42.168674698795186%
Multi-Core
1085
31.864904552129218%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |