Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 603 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 40% cheaper than FX-6350 - $60.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than FX-6350 - $0.86 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 4% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-2120T - 73 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 6 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 328 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |