Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $60.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-10400F - $0.09 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Valorant than Core i3-2120T - 779 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
779
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
69%
Price, $
$99.95
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |