Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2188 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $60.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.27 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-2120T - 232 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
57%
Price, $
$109.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |