Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-920 - 210 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $90.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-10320 - $0.48 vs $0.57 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |