Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 1436 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8300 - $90.0 vs $112.02
- Up to 19% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8300 - $0.39 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-920 - 234 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6578 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |