Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $90.0 vs $99.99
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Core i7-920 - 59 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-920 - $1.69 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |