Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1463 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 5% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3210 - 61 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $39.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-3210 - $0.64 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
