Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 973 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3210 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |