Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1616 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Celeron G1840 - 85 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |