Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2511 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 73% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1840 - 229 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
23.261169967756796%
Multi-Core
854
9.311961618144151%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |