Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2744 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 42% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1840 - 221 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $282.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
19.86624704956727%
Multi-Core
854
5.738861635642766%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |