Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 533 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 847 - 98 vs 94 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
