Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 442 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 847 - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |