Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $107
Availability
MSRP in USD: $107
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1345 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 3865U - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 6 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
