Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1710 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 3865U - 510 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
510
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |