Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 351% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron 3865U - 158 vs 35 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |