Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 3865U - 118 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |