Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 304 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 15 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Celeron 3205U - 675 vs 666 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
