Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 81 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1840 - 168 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
