Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1155 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 173 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 64 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
