Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1713 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Celeron G1840 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 15 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 53 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
