Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2029 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1840 - 519 vs 506 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
52.769070010449326%
Multi-Core
854
43.24050632911393%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |