Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2191 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1840 - 181 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
29.952550415183865%
Multi-Core
854
12.523830473676492%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |