Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 555 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 132 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |