Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 174 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 3205U - 125 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
