Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 671 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 15 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron 3205U - 199 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
