Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1725 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 3205U - 207 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
