Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 223 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3205U - 332 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
