Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 557 vs 475 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $232.12 vs $465.12
- Up to 42% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.49 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
557
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$465.12
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $465.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2799 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
475
85.27827648114902%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
37.03199455411845%
Multi-Core
3898
20.204219146840824%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |