Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 1667 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 201 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
162
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |