Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 95 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700U - 202 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |