Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1800X is 255 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X - $232.12 vs $275.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 1800X - $0.98 vs $1.16 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
84.48275862068965%
Price, $
$275
84%
Buy for $275 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2257 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
96.19805481874447%
Multi-Core
3898
67.96861377506539%
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |