Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-8320 - 99 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $95.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 5 2600 - $1.04 vs $1.41 per FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
73.75886524822695%
Price, $
$140
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5277 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
91.91919191919192%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |