Buy on Amazon
$178.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 679 days older than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8350 - $178.02 vs $185.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $1.16 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than FX-8320E - 155 vs 154 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
