Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $82.02 vs $432.77
- Up to 79% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900 - $0.33 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-8150 - 280 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8135 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
21%
Price, $
$432.77
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |