Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700T - 596 vs 531 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $99.9 vs $275.98
- Up to 59% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900 - $0.19 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
41%
Price, $
$275.98
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17126 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
531
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |