Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1812 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Core i5-5675C - 63 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $90.0 vs $415.77
- Up to 76% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - $1.58 vs $6.6 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.6/FPS
23.93939393939394%
Price, $
$415.77
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $415.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6491 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
57
90.47619047619048%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
78.63849765258216%
Multi-Core
4079
48.43842774017338%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |