Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $64.03 vs $179.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600K - $0.11 vs $0.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 34% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 802 vs 597 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1840 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
802
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
50%
Price, $
$179.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |