Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1999 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6350 - 218 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |