Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 186 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-9100F - 246 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $60.99 vs $410.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-9900K - $0.25 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
242
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $60.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |