Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $100.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-10700F - $0.61 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6350 - 174 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5656 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
46%
Price, $
$225.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5656 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |