Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400 - 62 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $130.16 vs $218.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700F - $2.21 vs $3.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.53/FPS
62%
Price, $
$218.99
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
95%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |